WHEN YOUR LAST WILL & TESTAMENT IS NOT FINAL. WHAT THE INHERITANCE (FAMILY PROVISION) ACT 1971 REALLY MEANS

WHEN YOUR LAST WILL & TESTAMENT IS NOT FINAL. WHAT THE INHERITANCE (FAMILY PROVISION) ACT 1971 REALLY MEANS

Categories: PlanningPublished On: May 4, 202610.3 min read
Ho Yi Yern
SHARE

Most people believe that once a Will is signed, their wishes are final. In Malaysia the Inheritance (Family Provision) Act 1971 empowers the Court to intervene a Will or intestacy distribution if it fails to provide reasonable financial support for certain dependants.

 

Who Can Challenge a Will in Malaysia?

The Inheritance (Family Provision) Act 1971 protects a limited group of dependants of a person who dies domiciled in Malaysia namely 1 :-

  • A surviving spouse;
  • An unmarried daughter, or a daughter unable to support herself due to disability;
  • A minor son; or
  • A son unable to support himself due to disability.

If you fall outside these categories, for example, independent adult children, you generally do not have a claim under this Act.

 

The Key Test: “Reasonable Provision”

The Court does not ask whether the distribution is fair or equal. Instead, the Court focuses whether the deceased made reasonable provision for the dependant’s maintenance.

If the provision is inadequate, the Court may order that maintenance be paid out of the deceased’s net estate, effectively varying the distribution.

 

What Can the Court Order?

Contrary to popular belief, the Court does not usually rewrite the will entirely. Instead, The Court typically orders periodic payments, not a lump sum, unless the estate is small (ie less than RM40,000). However, the payments are temporary and will stop upon certain events 2. The Act is designed to provide support, not to redistribute the deceased’s wealth outright.

 

There Are Strict Limits

The law also protects other Beneficiaries by imposing caps 3:

  • Up to 2/3 of the annual income of the deceased’s net estate if there is a spouse and one or more dependants; or
  • Up to 1/2 of the annual income of the deceased’s net estate if there is no spouse or only a spouse.

 

What Factors Will the Court Consider?

The Court has wide discretion and will examine the full context, including among others4 the dependant’s financial needs and resources, size and structure of the estate, interests of other Beneficiaries, dependant’s conduct and deceased’s reasons for excluding or limiting provision.

A written explanation left by the deceased’s Last Will & Testament can be persuasive but it is not automatically decisive.

 

Time Limit for Claims

Any claim must generally be filed within 6 months from the Grant of Probate or Letters of Administration being granted. While extensions are possible, they are not guaranteed5.

 

What This Means for Estate Planning

If your Last Will & Testament fails to provide for eligible dependants, it may be challenged and varied by the Court.

To reduce that risk, carefully assess the financial needs of dependants, avoid arbitrary exclusion, document clear reasons for your decisions and structure your estate with potential claims in mind6.

 

Conclusion

The Inheritance (Family Provision) Act 1971 serves as a safeguard against hardship, not a mechanism for equal distribution by balancing testamentary freedom with the duty to make reasonable provision for dependants. A well drafted Will remains fundamental. However, anticipating and addressing these statutory safeguards is equally important to ensure effective estate administration and to minimise the risk of the Will being challenged.

 

1 Section 3(1) of the Inheritance (Family Provision) Act 1971

2 Section 3(2) of the Inheritance (Family Provision) Act 1971   – Remarriage of a spouse; Marriage of a daughter; A son attaining 21 years of age; Cessation of a disability or death.

3 Section 3(3) of the Inheritance (Family Provision) Act 1971

4 Section 5,6,7,8 of the Inheritance (Family Provision) Act 1971

5 SOO HOI LING & ORS v. KHOH KEOW BOK (SUED AS CO-ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF KHOH LIAK TENG AND IN HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY) & ORS [2019] CLJU 1924 HIGH COURT MALAYA, GEORGETOWN

“[17] Fourthly, the claim for maintenance under s. 3(1) of the Inheritance (Family Provision) Act 1971 is barred by s. 4(1) of the same Act. The section provides that such an application must be made within six months from the date representation in regard to the deceased’s estate was taken out. In the present case, the letters of administration were issued by this Court on 2.10.2018 and therefore any claim ought to have been made not later than 2.4.2019. … Section 3(1) expressly requires that any such maintenance must be paid out of the deceased’s net estate. A reading of the definition of “net estate” provided in s. 2 reveal the result that any payment under s. 3(1) can only be made after settlement of all the debts and liabilities of the deceased. Since the debts and liabilities are yet to be discharged no payment under s. 3(1) for maintenance could be made.”

6 LIEW WENGTANG v. CHEW MEU JONG & ANOR [2019] CLJU 1924 HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR

“6. Clause 7 of the Will provides as follows:

“In the event that any of the beneficiaries under this Will dispute the validity of this Will or make any claim against my estate whether under the Inheritance (Family Provision) Act, 1971 or any re-enactment or statutory modification thereof or otherwise (save in respect of any lawful debt owed to that person by my estate at the date of death), the beneficiary’s entitlement under this Will shall be forfeited and shall fall into the Residue Estate.”

7. Relying upon clause 7, the first defendant has imposed a precondition for the release of any legacy, namely that the beneficiary must first furnish a letter of confirmation and undertaking (“the Letter of Undertaking”)…

54. Accordingly, I make the following orders:

(i) It is declared that the defendants are not entitled to impose any precondition, including the requirement for a Letter of Undertaking, prior to the release of legacies under the Will; … (iii) It is declared that the defendants have breached their fiduciary duties as executrixes by withholding the plaintiffs legacy on the basis of an unauthorised precondition; …”

About the Author: Ho Yi Yern

Ho Yi Yern is an Advocate & Solicitor of the High Court of Malaya, Partner and Head of Family Law, Succession & Estate Administration in Messrs Azhar & Goh, proud member of Worldwide International Lawyers League (WILL), Malaysian Collaborative Practice Group (MCPG) and International Academy of Collaborative Professionals (IACP), guiding clients through Wills, inheritance, and family-related legal matters. She is dedicated to empowering individuals and families make informed strategic decisions that safeguard their loved ones and preserve their legacy.

About the Author: Ho Yi Yern
Ho Yi Yern is a Family and Estate Planning Advocate & Solicitor of the High Court of Malaya, Partner and Head of Family Law, Succession & Estate Administration in Messrs Azhar & Goh, proud member of Worldwide International Lawyers League (WILL), Malaysian Collaborative Practice Group (MCPG) and International Academy of Collaborative Professionals (IACP), guiding clients through Wills, inheritance, and family-related legal matters. She is dedicated to empowering individuals and families make informed strategic decisions that safeguard their loved ones and preserve their legacy.
WILL WRITING AFTER DIVORCE